Relevance of Autopsy Photos in Homicide and Murder Cases in Arizona

James Novak

In a criminal case revolving around homicide or murder, it is a long-standing rule in Arizona that photos of the victim’s body are automatically relevant to the proceedings. This rule can be harmful for defendants in these cases, especially in jury trials where jury members will be jarred or emotionally distraught by the photos. In a recent murder case before the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, the defendant tried to fight the trial court’s decision to admit photos of an autopsy in his case. His argument ultimately failed, and the higher court reminded him that the photos were automatically relevant because they showed the victim’s body after the murder.

Facts of the Case

The defendant in this case faced criminal charges after an incident outside of a bar one evening. The defendant engaged in a rap battle with another person, which turned violent. The second person removed his shirt and started to approach the defendant. The defendant then immediately pulled out a gun and fired shots in the second person’s direction, hitting him in the face and torso. Paramedics quickly came to the scene but were ultimately unable to resuscitate the individual. The next day, the defendant, who had fled the scene, turned himself into the police.

The State charged the defendant with second-degree murder, and his case went to trial. As part of the proceedings before the trial court, the prosecution introduced photographs of the decedent’s body. At the time, the defendant did not object, but he later argued that the photographs were inappropriately admitted into evidence. The court denied this argument, and the jury found the defendant guilty as charged. The court sentenced the defendant to time in prison.

more State v. Morris

On appeal, the defendant again argued that the court should not have allowed the jury to see the autopsy photos. The photos were not relevant, said the defendant, and they were prejudicial to his case. On appeal, the court disagreed, citing a case called State v. Morris that says that “photographs of a victim’s body are always relevant because the fact and cause of death are always relevant in a murder prosecution.” Because the photos were therefore automatically relevant, the defendant’s appeal had no merit. The court denied the defendant’s appeal and affirmed the conviction for second-degree murder.

Do You Need a Phoenix Criminal Defense Attorney to Help You Fight Your Charges?

If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges in Arizona, give the Law Office of James E. Novak a call so that we can help you figure out how to move forward. Our team is poised to offer you high-quality, experience-based representation when it matters most. If you want the most aggressive Phoenix criminal defense attorney by your side, look no further than our firm. For a free and confidential consultation with a Phoenix criminal defense attorney, call us today at 480-413-1499. You can also fill out our online form to have someone from our team reach back out to you as soon as possible about your case.

Recent Entries

When Can an Officer Reasonably Prolong a Traffic Stop in Arizona? In Arizona, an officer that sees an individual commit a traffic violation can reasonably initiate a traffic stop. The traffic stop must only last the...

What Are the Differences Between DUI, Extreme DUI, and Aggravated DUI in Arizona? In Arizona, as in every state, there are consequences for driving under the influence (DUI). What many people don’t know, however, is that there are...

Arizona Defendant Unsuccessfully Argues Prosecution Improperly Used Accomplice’s Statements During Trial In a recent case before the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, the defendant asked the court to reconsider his conviction and sentence for...

Free eBooks

Free DUI & Criminal Defense eBook

About James E. Novak

James E. Novak participates in several legal organizations including The Arizona Attorneys For Criminal Justice, The Association of Trial Lawyers of America, and others.

Client Reviews

 I was facing criminal charges with three priors in my history. Mr Novak was very helpful and got me a lighter sentence than I probably deserved. He is a great attorney and I would highly recommend him.

- A.T.

James worked tirelessly behind the scenes with the prosecution, to decrease my son’s charges to a more reasonable penalty. I could not have asked for a better, more professional attorney. He treated my son with the utmost respect and walked him through every step of a very difficult situation.

- S. G.

Attorney Novak did an outstanding job defending my son. Due to his extensive professional background within the court system, he was successfully able to defend my son during a very difficult time for my family. I highly recommend Attorney James Novak for your legal needs.

- T. G.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Initial Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Defends ALL Types of DUI Cases
Fill out the contact form or call us at (480) 413-1499 to schedule your free initial consultation.

Leave Us a Message